What Wikipedia promised, TruthExchange delivers—collaborative truth-seeking with systematic evidence evaluation
Join researchers, citizens, and truth-seekers building transparent methodology
Editorial gatekeeping controls "truth"—especially on modern controversies where bias matters most.
Centralized bias disguised as objectivity—trust us, we're the experts.
Echo chambers without evidence standards—confirmation bias at scale.
TruthExchange applies social networking to evidence evaluation. Submit claims, verify sources together, follow researchers you trust, and expose manipulation attempts through transparent community methodology.
Post controversial claims and start gathering evidence. Claims and evidence are first-class objects, not buried in narrative articles.
Community verifies sources, identifies logical fallacies, and tracks manipulation through systematic methodology.
Transparent consensus emerges through systematic methodology that can't be controlled by ideological gatekeepers.
Not buried in narrative articles—evidence and claims stand on their own for transparent evaluation.
Follow trusted researchers and build credibility weighting through transparent community relationships.
Logical fallacies identified systematically, not left to editorial judgment or political bias.
Community verification exposes manipulation attempts through transparent methodology.
Researchers who need reliable source verification and citizens seeking truth over confirmation bias.
Anyone frustrated with Wikipedia's political spin and ready for transparent methodology.
Be among the first to experience collaborative truth-seeking when we launch the beta.
You'll be notified when we launch the beta. No spam, just truth.